?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Oddity, Absurdity, and Harmony [entries|friends|calendar]
Fizzbang

[ website | FZ! (pronounced "Fizzbang") ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ calendar | livejournal calendar ]

North Dakota, the Land of Mass Murderer [19 Feb 2009|10:24am]
In an attempt to redefine the laws to make abortion illegal, the legislative assembly of North Dakota has passed the stunningly ill-conceived House Bill 1572, which defines a person as "includes any organism with the
genome of homo sapiens.
"

Obviously, the conservative goal with this is to push the law towards declaring a fetus as a human with full rights equal to a mother, and to declare voluntary abortion as murder. However, in the over-reaching grasp of its language, the North Dakota legislature has just defined every living cell cast off by a human as a human deserving full rights.

What does this mean? Among other things, that every single ovum and sperm in every single human in North Dakota is now a separate legal entity, each with the full rights of a human being.

Any female who menstruates is responsible for the death of a person (ovum). That makes most females a murderer every month or so.

Any male who masturbates is responsible for the deaths of approximately 40 million people (sperm). That makes most males mass murderers on scales that dwarf every single genocidal tyrant in history combined.

Any couple that has sex and conceives a child is still responsible for the death of slightly less than 40 million people (sperm), because only one or two of those sperm will actually survive.

It also means every single person in North Dakota has quite a few dependents they can claim on their taxes, ranging mostly between 400,000 to hundreds of millions, depending on the number of ovum or sperm they carry.

All because the legislature wanted to veil their pro-life intentions in the guise of science they didn't understand. The lesson here - apart from the general idiocy of North Dakota's legislature - is that non-scientists shouldn't try to use science to legislate their non-scientific morality.
12 comments|post comment

Not Dead! [23 Jan 2009|12:12pm]
Hey, LJ! Been a while, huh?

A few days ago, I realized that it had been nearly a month since my last LiveJournal posting. I still read through here to see how everyone's doing, and occasionally comment here and there, but I find that when I have something to say or share, it never seems to end up on LJ anymore.

If it's short communication - something witty or a curiosity to share with the world, I'll toss it up on Twitter (where I'm also Fizzbang). But if it's something deeper and more long-form than a little quip, I'll type it up and post it on my actual website (you can find it here).

My LJ account isn't going anywhere, of course, and I intend to still keep it for when I've got posts or issues to talk about that are more personal than a professional website warrants, and deeper than a 140-character limit allows. I'm just explaining why my posts have been pretty spotty, here.

But for the record, I'm doing pretty well and all that. I'm holding my breath in anticipation of a lot of potentially awesome things in the next few weeks (going to Pittsburgh for the Steelers Superbowl, having a birthday, and seeing if I win a Writer's Guild Award for Fallout 3). So, somewhat stressful and exciting times!
5 comments|post comment

Inauguration Rant [19 Dec 2008|01:36pm]
You may have seen people up in arms about the fact that Obama has asked conservative Evangelical mega-pastor Rick Warren to give the invocation at the inauguration. Large swaths of the left have expressed outrage that Obama has "betrayed" them by inviting a preacher who is anti gay-rights. Even very intelligent and respectable people like Rachel Maddow and John Hodgman have expressed the same disappointment at Obama's choice.

But these people are only paying attention to half of the story. They're ignoring a thousand things they agree with, just to get angry at one thing they don't. The thing that everyone seems to be forgetting is that Warren is only one of the two pastors officiating at the inauguration.

The pastor giving the benediction is Reverend Joseph Lowery: a man whose support for gay marriage and civil rights in general is unquestionable and steadfast. He is a man so firmly progressive that he would drive the conservative right into fits of apoplexy if he were even in the same room as Bush - and in fact, he did exactly that, at Coretta Scott King’s funeral. He is, in so many ways, the polar opposite of Warren, while being as fiery as Reverend Wright -- with none of the crazy.

And yet, everyone ignores Lowery’s presence there, and acts as if Warren is the only one attending. People who should know better are getting whipped into a fury because Obama dares to have representatives from both sides of the spectrum at the beginning of a presidency where he promised to govern for all of America’s citizens.

Diplomacy means interacting with people we find distasteful and trying to convince them to change, not shutting them out and trying to pretend they aren’t real. We’ve had eight years of a president who ignored people he didn’t agree with, and we’ve fought like crazy to change that. Are we really going to throw a tantrum when we finally get the change we want?
31 comments|post comment

"Dance Dance," from a different Fallout Boy [28 Nov 2008|02:00pm]
Found over at the excellent games site, Offworld, here's a holiday message of celebration and good cheer from the cast of Fallout 3:


This is why I love modders. This right here.
post comment

Fantasticker Contraption? [13 Nov 2008|07:27pm]
If you're anything like me or cocotopia, you might want to free up a few days before reading about this new Flash game.

If you remember the wonderful time-sink that is Fantastic Contraption, you'll recognize the heart of the still-in-beta game, Incredibots: build strange little devices, then set them loose on a playground of engineering dares.

But Incredibots aims to be the ultimate power-user's version of this game: rather than using only a handful of one-type-fits-all pieces, Incredibots gives you much more depth of control of each piece (sliding joints, motor strength, speed, limitation, density, etc). It also gives you much more control over the rest of your play - map engines to different keys and control your devices directly. Set your own goals for pure sandbox levels. Save, copy, post, share, and comment on your inventions. Build human-like effigies with controllable joints, put on a puppet-show with text balloons, save the whole thing, and post it as a video on your blog. The amount of control is nothing short of, well, incredible.

In fact, it's almost too much. After going through the excellent tutorial levels, I was daunted by the idea of what to do next. Like Leigh Alexander's experience playing Fallout 3, I was paralyzed with indecision at how much I could do in the game.

(It may also be that the game is just a little too complicated, with too many options and a UI that's a little clumsier than FC's hotkey-able gears and friendly icons. But since it's still in beta, I'm inclined to cut it some slack in that regard.)

In any case, if you can't get enough of Fantastic Contraption, check out Incredibots. Just make sure you've cleared your schedule.
1 comment|post comment

Tag With Stuff [11 Nov 2008|10:53am]
Tonight, Sci-Fi's will be premiering a new realty-/game-show called Cha$e and - stupid punctuation-as-letter-use aside - it seems like it could be some cheesy fun.

It's billed as a "live-action video game" but it's basically just tag in a city with a whole bunch of extra rules, occasional mini-game challenges, and cash money for the last survivor. Sort of like Journey to the End of the Night, or "Tag With Stuff," if you will.

Anyway, the first episode is tonight, and you can watch it right now on their website. I'll wait until tonight to watch, but I'm curiously interested.
2 comments|post comment

Religious Extremists are a Threat to America [10 Nov 2008|05:03pm]
Turns out that Bush and the neoconservatives were right: religious extremists bearing ill will towards our government are a threat to the nation. After Obama's election, there's been a sharp spike in communication about how he's the Enemy and talking about his death - from extreme fundamentalist cells hidden across the United States, all too close to home.

Except Bush & Co. was wrong about one thing: this isn't from radical Muslims claiming America is the great Satan - it's from radical Christians claiming Obama is the Antichrist. Google Trends shows that since Obama's election, searches for "antichrist" have risen more than tenfold, with "Obama-is-the-antichrist" webpages receiving record-breaking traffic.

As much as I'd like to laugh them off as wackos, it's a terrifying fact that the secret service has already broken up two assassination plots, and blame Palin's attacks for a sharp increase in death threats to Obama. I'm glad our Secret Service is top-notch, because I get the feeling they'll have to bring their A-game.

Of course, many less-religious Republicans fear Obama will bring problems other than the End of Days, and it's generally easier to laugh these off.

And even if the apocalypse does show up, the New York Times says that post-apocalyptic DC is a great place to spend my time!
4 comments|post comment

Yes, more politics [05 Nov 2008|03:31pm]
From TIME magazine, an excellent article on what Obama's sweeping win means for a new America:
Obama's decision to expend so much effort on a field organization was quietly revolutionary and a perfect fit for the larger political philosophy that he described when I spoke with him a few weeks ago. Obama insisted that while creating a new energy economy was his No. 1 priority, "we can't divorce the energy issue from what I believe has to be the dominant political theme underlying everything — the economy, health care, you name it. And that is restoring a sense that we're growing the economy from the bottom up and not the top down. That's the overarching philosophical change that we've got to have."

That was the substantive heart of his campaign and of this election. It was a stark difference between the candidates. Unlike many elections I've covered where the stakes were small and the differences between the candidates were minor, this was a big election, with big differences between the candidates. It was a referendum on the Reagan era. Try as he might to dissociate himself from the Bush Administration, John McCain remained a classic Reaganite. He believed in the unilateral exercise of American power overseas, with an emphasis on military might rather than diplomacy. He believed in trickle-down, supply-side, deregulatory economics: his tax plan benefited corporations and the wealthy, in the hopes that with fewer shackles, they would create more jobs. Obama was quite the opposite. Unlike Bill Clinton, whose purpose was to humanize Reaganism but not really challenge it, Obama offered a full-throated rebuttal to Clinton's notion that "the era of Big Government is over." He was a liberal, as charged. But the public was ready, after a 30-year conservative pendulum swing, for activist government.

...

But this election was about much more than issues. It was the ratification of an essential change in the nature of the country. I've seen two others in my lifetime. The election of John Kennedy ratified the new America that had emerged from war and depression — a place where more people owned homes and went to college, a place where young people had the affluence to be idealistic or to rebel, a place that was safe enough to get a little crazy, a sexier country. Ronald Reagan's election was a rebellion against that — an announcement that toughness had replaced idealism overseas, that individual economic freedom had replaced common economic purpose at home. It was an act of nostalgia, harking back to the "real" America — white, homogeneous, small-town — that the McCain campaign unsuccessfully tried to appeal to.

Obama's victory creates the prospect of a new "real" America. We can't possibly know its contours yet, although I suspect the headline is that it is no longer homogeneous. It is no longer a "white" country, even though whites remain the majority. It is a place where the primacy of racial identity — and this includes the old, Jesse Jackson version of black racial identity — has been replaced by the celebration of pluralism, of cross-racial synergy. After eight years of misgovernance, it has lost some of its global swagger ... but also some of its arrogance. It may no longer be as dominant, economically or diplomatically, as it once was. But it is younger, more optimistic, less cynical. It is a country that retains its ability to startle the world — and in a good way, with our freedom. It is a place, finally, where the content of our President's character is more important than the color of his skin.
post comment

[05 Nov 2008|01:49pm]
As amusing as FakeSarahPalin has been on Twitter, I was more impressed with their explanation that, for the good of bipartisanship and in the spirit of Obama's speech, FakeSarahPalin was shutting down for good.
1 comment|post comment

Word! [04 Nov 2008|04:13pm]
First of all, if you haven't voted yet, go do that!

When you've voted, come back and check this fascinating little web-gizmo on the New York Times site - type in a word that describes how you're feeling, and then select which candidate you voted for (or "neither"). Then take a look at the reported moods of other supporters of McCain, Obama, or both.

Filtering by either candidate is particularly revealing - here are the last handful of responses for each candidate:

McCain: worried, nervous, impatient, betrayed, frustrated

Obama: hopeful, proud, inspired, patriotic, happy
post comment

GO VOTE! [04 Nov 2008|08:41am]
Voting looks to be hot and heavy today. I got to the polls an hour early and was still about 50th in line. By the they opened, the line went around the block. Even so, once it got under way, it got going fast.

But persevere! Remember that the polls are usually lightest early in the day (pre-opening line notwithstanding), so try to head over before work or at lunch if you can. If worst comes to worst, bring a book and an umbrella. This is a historic day for America, so don't pass on a chance to be a part of it!

And if that doesn't motivate you, then maybe this will:

2 comments|post comment

A Public Service Message [04 Nov 2008|12:29am]
[ mood | Excited ]

Go out and vote. Find your local polling place here. Go there and get your vote on.

Vote for whoever you want. Obviously, I'd prefer if you vote for Obama, and if you can't bring yourself to vote for him, to vote for Bob Barr, but it's your right to vote for who you see fit. However, it's your duty and privilege as a citizen of this country to vote, so get going! There are starving, nondemocratic children in China, y'know.

Afterwards, drspooky and I will be rocking out at a Flobots show at the 9:30 Club, complete with ready access to metro transit and post-election riots.

6 comments|post comment

Adam Smith, Father of Capitalism, Fan of Taxing the Rich [30 Oct 2008|03:04pm]
Inspired by tongodeon's post about why flat and superflat taxes don't work, and by emuofdarkness's concern that taxing the rich at a higher rate discourages industry, I'd like to share this quote from Adam Smith, the father of capitalism and modern economics:
"The necessaries of life occasion the great expence of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it. The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expence of the rich, and a magnificent house embellishes and sets off to the best advantage all the other luxuries and vanities which they possess. A tax upon house-rents, therefore, would in general fall heaviest upon the rich; and in this sort of inequality there would not, perhaps, be any thing very unreasonable. It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expence, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion."
- Adam Smith, "The Wealth of Nations"
(emphasis mine - or actually tongodeon's.)

So next time you hear someone claim that Obama is a Marxist, Communist, or Socialist, now you can point out that he's actually just being a smart Capitalist.
5 comments|post comment

Items of Interest - Religion: UR DOIN' IT RONG. [30 Oct 2008|01:27pm]


False Idols: Extremist Christians declared today a "Day of Prayer for the World's Economies." Fair enough, as the recent economic shifts require us all to rethink how we spend and save. But I'm not sure this is the best way to go about it, and I'm pretty sure the Bible had some strong words about praying to false idols - particularly metallic ruminants.

Signs Revealed in Magic Paper: Okay, it's not your standard sort of magical religious revelation, but this demonstration of Microsoft's SecondLight projection system absolutely qualifies as "sufficiently advanced technology." Watching it made me realize this - We live in a future where we have portable internet and magic paper, so who the fuck needs flying cars and jetpacks?

My Name is Hussein: A couple weeks ago, many of us were joking about the RNC's focus on using Obama's middle name as a way to make voters fear him as a Muslim. On our mailing list, drspooky changed his middle name to Hussein, as a sign of support for Obama, and to highlight the fact that it's a perfectly normal American name, like any other - seriously, how scary can a name that means "beautiful" possibly be? Before long, pyrtolin took the joke to Facebook. And now, that group has over 800 members around the country, and is getting media attention. Just one more case of my friends and I slowly taking over the world. Oh yes.
9 comments|post comment

Falllout in the News [26 Oct 2008|09:54pm]
Anyone who got a copy of the Sunday Washington Post, keep an eye out for their review of Fallout 3!
post comment

Release Party! [24 Oct 2008|12:20pm]
Best Buy is doing midnight launch events for Fallout 3, and we're having a big event at the Best Buy at 1200 Rockville Pike!

I'll be showing up around 9ish, to begin tailgating and generally celebrating like a fool. Hope to see you!

Yes, yes, you've already seen this on ghostgirl's and drspooky's blogsCollapse )




5 comments|post comment

Writers for Obama! [22 Oct 2008|05:08pm]
It should be no surprise that David Sedaris is for Obama. His view of still undecided voters makes it clear:
To put them in perspective, I think of being on an airplane. The flight attendant comes down the aisle with her food cart and, eventually, parks it beside my seat. “Can I interest you in the chicken?” she asks. “Or would you prefer the platter of shit with bits of broken glass in it?”

To be undecided in this election is to pause for a moment and then ask how the chicken is cooked.
But it may surprise you to learn of another writer who just announced her support for Obama: Judy Blume.
In some ways an election is like life – a lot of muck comes your way. It’s hard sometimes to slog through it. It’s exhausting. It can be scary. You can feel like you’re drowning in it. You’ve got to work hard to pull yourself up and out of it, then to rise above it. We need a leader who can help us do that. That's why I'm supporting Barack Obama.

All I ask is that you make an informed decision. It's about the issues. It's about health care, the economy, education, the environment, a woman's right to choose, equal pay for equal work -- it's about who will be appointed to the Supreme Court, and it's about never rushing into war again - not without all the facts, not without trying everything we can to prevent war first. This election is too important for all of us to decide in any other way.

Tell your parents, tell your grandparents, it's not just about them this time. It's about you and your future. It's about my grandson's future. That's why I'm speaking out.
2 comments|post comment

Cruel DCist! [17 Oct 2008|02:07pm]


The first DC game of Cruel 2 B Kind is tomorrow, and we should have plenty of players, if this DCist post is any sign!

Remember, in order to play, you'll need to sign up at the website! See you there!
2 comments|post comment

Politics! [16 Oct 2008|05:21pm]
My quick summary of the debates: McCain came out pretty strong in the first 30 minutes, leaving Obama on the defensive... until McCain finally walked onto a large, cartoon "X" that had been left on the ground (in the form of comments about Ayers and ACORN). Then Obama pulled a lever and an anvil flattened McCain. After that point, McCain went from grumpy to seething.

Of course, there may be a simpler way to measure the debate: according to Boston University psychology professor J.J. Tecce, it all comes down to who blinks the most. "The candidate who blinked more than his opponent during debates has lost every election since 1976, with one noticeable exception. In the 2000 race, the blink-happy Bush lost the popular vote to Democrat Al Gore, but won the White House."

Some of you may remember back to when Al Jazeera news did a report on how racism was impacting the Democratic primary race in Kentucky and West Virginia. Well, they've got another report on how racism coming out in the Palin rallies in Ohio. It's pretty ugly.

And speaking of ugly racism, a California GOP group sent out a mailer that can only be described as "ridiculously racist." It depicts a "Ten Dollars Obama Bucks" bill, labeled as "United States Food Stamps," featuring Obama's face on a donkey's body, surrounded by pictures of ribs, fried chicken, a watermellon slice, and the Kool-Aid man.

When confronted on its racist overtones, the president of the organization, Diane Fedele, said: “I didn’t see it the way that it’s being taken. I never connected. It was just food to me.”
5 comments|post comment

Items of Interest! [15 Oct 2008|04:17pm]
The New York Times examines the rising number of females studying parkour, along with a video interview of one traceuse (the feminine form of "traceur," or practitioner of parkour), describing the differences in common technique and form that comes from the general body differences between males and females. As always, the practice of harmonious and graceful movement is fascinating to me, and it's an interesting insight into how one's unique body form changes the practice of an art that's all about moving efficiently in harmony with your environment.

Speaking of which, I've been wanting to get back into studying a martial art, preferably a soft style (like tai chi) or hard/soft style (like kung fu). Anyone in the Rockville area know a good place to do this? There's a couple local places I've seen, but they're very much the "Americanized martial arts for kids" sort of places, and I'm looking for someplace that's got an eye towards the tradition and mindset, rather than just the sport of it all.

And for everyone who enjoyed "Barack Obama is your new bicycle," prepare to enjoy "When Obama wins...." A bit presumptive, of course, but when the best polling aggregate site has his chance of winning over 95%, a bit of humor is probably allowed.

Also, don't forget that the DC game of Cruel 2 B Kind is this Saturday! If you're looking for a fun time and a chance to meet a bunch of similarly-minded weirdos, come play!
6 comments|post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]